-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mugwog
HTDA Friday Subheadliner
NIN closes Sunday
Cum cleanup crew works till Wednesday to clean up all NIN fan jizz.
HTDA would not be a sub. They would be like 3rd or 4th line.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Drewski27
HTDA would not be a sub. They would be like 3rd or 4th line.
Agreed
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
I doubt he would have both bands play Coachella the same weekend(s)
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
I'm only putting that out in reference to his AMA note about rehearsing for two bands for 2013. All you Radiohead fucktards got to release your Yorke jizz the last few years, let us Trentards do the same.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TickleMeElmo
I follow Indiechella on Facebook and pretty much all of those we're added right after their respective "sources" came out, with the exception of Kill the Noise who was posted much much earlier.
Ok, good to know. So it just updates whenever a new rumor comes out. Not an inside source. Lame.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
How to Destroy Angels deserves whatever booking Zack de la Rocha's unremarkable sideproject with one or two eps got.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Miroir Noir
How to Destroy Angels deserves whatever booking Zack de la Rocha's unremarkable sideproject with one or two eps got.
I wish Atoms for Peace got that slot...."OMG THOM! HE DANCES SO SEXY!"
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mysticism
There's been literally no official statements regarding MGMT's third album, which, even though is currently being worked on, is clearly not going to be out by the end of the year or the beginning of next year. Right now, all signs point toward a late summer/early fall release.
Did this come from their mgmt?
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Consider adding the Maccabees to the rumor list. They confirmed at a show at the El Ray last month that they would be on tour again in the states in the spring, and from talking directly with them, they were looking at playing festivals but they would not confirm or deny which ones. IO Echo, who opened for them, also talked about playing some festivals...
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
heart cooks brain
so TR, in his reddit AMA teased 2013 NIN shit, dodged the coachella question, and said he was starting rehearsals for 'two bands'.
Be on the lookout. Monklish is probably going to steal this shit from the boards and put it up as one of her "predictions."
She may even try to make it look like she "predicted" it 6 months ago.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Monklish's inside info is the inside info of someone else's inside info.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mrhand
Be on the lookout. Monklish is probably going to steal this shit from the boards and put it up as one of her "predictions."
She may even try to make it look like she "predicted" it 6 months ago.
Actually NIN has been on both of her lists this year
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mrhand
Be on the lookout. Monklish is probably going to steal this shit from the boards and put it up as one of her "predictions."
She may even try to make it look like she "predicted" it 6 months ago.
No one gives a fuck.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Drewski27
HTDA would not be a sub. They would be like 3rd or 4th line.
Regardless of whether they deserve the status or not, anything involving Reznor would never go lower than the 3rd line, and the odds of them being a sub definitely increase due to the same factor. Sub or 3rd instead of 3rd/4th.
Paul has a vested interest in kissing Trent's (and any other industry giant's) ass and keeping him happy. That doesn't involve putting his wife and treasured side project on the 4th line.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mrhand
Regardless of whether they deserve the status or not, anything involving Reznor would never go lower than the 3rd line, and the odds of them being a sub definitely increase due to the same factor. Sub or 3rd instead of 3rd/4th.
Paul has a vested interest in kissing Trent's (and any other industry giant's) ass and keeping him happy. That doesn't involve putting his wife and treasured side project on the 4th line.
Jesus fuck you are stupid.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GuyInTucson
No one gives a fuck.
Go on...
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Drewski27
Jesus fuck you are stupid.
This from the guy trying to sell Trent Reznor on the 4th line. Fucking gold.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mrhand
You continue to confuse me looking at Monklish's blog and briefly viewing her accuracy for me genuinely caring whether she is right or wrong. Monklish's accuracy has no bearing on, well, anything really. If it went away, my life would be the same. It's a time-passer. Nothing more, nothing less.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
A Trent Reznor side project. That has one ep. That is not NIN. Get bent. 3rd or 4th line.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Two EPs and an album coming soon.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Ok, my mistake. Wrong on that account. I love Trent and NIN as much as anyone other fan, but just because it's Trent Reznors band does not automatically make them a subheadliner.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GuyInTucson
You continue to confuse me looking at Monklish's blog and briefly viewing her accuracy for me genuinely caring whether she is right or wrong. Monklish's accuracy has no bearing on, well, anything really. If it went away, my life would be the same. It's a time-passer. Nothing more, nothing less.
Oh.....I get it now. Not giving a fuck = regularly looking at her blog and briefly viewing her accuracy. CLEARLY MY MISTAKE.
Does it ever get old being the kid with cookie crumbs all over his face screaming about how no one gives a fuck about cookies?
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
EVERYONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT COOKIES.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Somebody's parents didn't love them enough.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
guedita
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
EVERYONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT COOKIES.
EVERYONE.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
guedita
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
EVERYONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT COOKIES.
Especially the ones laced with drugs?
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Drewski27
...but just because it's Trent Reznors band does not automatically make them a subheadliner.
Correct. But it does automatically preclude them from the 4th line. The same applies to the pile of crap that is Puscifer, or would apply to Thom Yorke's hypothetical side project collaborating with a pod of baby seals, or Jay-Z's brand new dynamic duo starring William Hung.
-
Re: 2013 Lineup Confirmation/Rumors Thread
Pretty sure Puscifer wouldn't be above 3rd line.