View Full Version : Is any band worth doing a video project for this year?

03-26-2008, 03:52 PM
Curious as to what everyone's opinion is. I think I'm up for another one this year, but I can't really decide who, and who would everyone else be up to camcordering during performance?

edit> I will put the mbrunet project up as a divx soon.

03-26-2008, 03:54 PM
Stephen Malkmus and the Jicks.

03-27-2008, 09:20 PM
Hot Chip
or Calvin Harris
or Kraftwerk
or Aphex Twin

cansei de ser sexme
03-27-2008, 09:22 PM
Hot Chip and Kraftwerk

rage patton
03-27-2008, 09:33 PM
Gogol Bordello.

I would kill to get my hands on one.

03-27-2008, 09:38 PM

Gogol would definitely be an interesting crew to document.

03-27-2008, 09:47 PM
Are we excluding the obvious ones or something?

03-27-2008, 10:29 PM
Roger Waters
The Verve
Aphex Twin

Weeping Willow
03-27-2008, 11:07 PM
The Verve
Aphex Twin

03-28-2008, 01:54 AM
Gogol Bordello.

I would kill to get my hands on one.

absolutely agree

03-30-2008, 05:23 PM
I am saying Portishead, at first i was hoping they were not headlining and doing the sunset timeslot which would be supreme. but still a video project for them would be good especially their ditties with the lining of the palm trees sounds perfect.

APhex Twin could be great too.
Animal Collective

el chango
03-30-2008, 05:28 PM
I'd go with Kraftwerk, Gogol Bordello or Portishead

03-30-2008, 06:16 PM
Roger waters?

03-30-2008, 07:00 PM
Gogol, Portishead, Waters, Aphex

Any or all of the above are more than worthy.

03-31-2008, 04:57 AM
Are we excluding the obvious ones or something?

No, but taking into account artists that already have good video coverage.

Aphex Twin doesn't have any coverage with live drumming that I've been able to find. Gogol doesn't have very good in-concert video either it seems.

Portishead and Waters already have very professional recordings of them live, is it worthy of a project, or will something about their performance be unique/special at coachella?

Just something to think about, good responses so far.