2012: The Year in Images

[suprefan]

Well, since it didn't all end like it shouldve, here is this thread again. Not as much stuff as previous years, but enough I am sure. We'll see what comes up next year, though. No spamming or posting your useless bullshit in here. If you want to post your material which you think is ''good'', make a thread, dont ruin a good thing with your crap, thanks.



Radiohead













Coachella

[suprefan]

Pitchfork























Thom Yorke & Nigel Godrich




James Murphy



Animal Collective



Snow Patrol






Dustin Kensrue



Thrice



Refused





FYF Fest

[Neighborhood Creep]

Looking good.

*waits for xanman86 to toss some garbage in here*

[Spooks]

Well, since it didn't all end like it shouldve, here is this thread again. Not as much stuff as previous years, but enough I am sure. We'll see what comes up next year, though. No spamming or posting your useless bullshit in here. If you want to post your material which you think is ''good'', make a thread, dont ruin a good thing with your crap, thanks.

Credential for this thread: Photo pass (or standing in line for couple hours to get the rail ) or GTFO!

[Drinkey McDrinkerstein]

Wow Chris, you really outdid yourself this year! This is by far the best collection of photos you've ever posted, so many consistently good shots.

[paulb]

The 2nd photo of the Starcaster on the keyboard.....is that from the Chicago gig? Absolutely fuckin awesome collection there man.

[xanman86]

Amazing as usual, Chris. I'm glad your Coachella photos were not lost.

[algunz]

Love this:

[ivankay]

Great year Chris!

[rage patton]

That Dr. Dre picture is pretty outstanding.

[xanman86]

That Dr. Dre picture is pretty outstanding.

This

[mountmccabe]

There are some great shots in here... and a lot of shots that are fine. And what, have all of them already been posted?

Edit, man. If this thread had half as many pictures it would be twice as interesting.

[suprefan]

There are some great shots in here... and a lot of shots that are fine. And what, have all of them already been posted?

Edit, man. If this thread had half as many pictures it would be twice as interesting.

Edit John? So you wanted me to post 40 photos instead of the 80 in here, which mind you came from a crop of about 60,000 photos to make this more interesting in your eyes? I could have posted all 500 I had even set aside for this thread, and then just heard you say I am spamming. Sure, most been posted somewhere, but lots of people miss them, so there is nothing wrong with showing something youve seen 6 months ago so a new person can look at them for the first time. This is a recap, not a debut exibition. If I was going to do that, I would hold it all back. But whats the use in that approach? Did you hear me complain that you had too many wedding photos to browse through when you posted em? Am I devaluing my artistic integrity by showing MORE?


Paul, yep.

Xanman, all I lost at Coachella was maybe 1,000 photos from Sunday, which was when my own camera was misplaced.


Josh, that was the 1st photo I took and ended up being my favorite from that set.

[xanman86]

Xanman, all I lost at Coachella was maybe 1,000 photos from Sunday, which was when my own camera was misplaced.

Damn at least it wasn't all of it but that still blows. I forget, did you go to both weekends?

[mountmccabe]

Edit John? So you wanted me to post 40 photos instead of the 80 in here, which mind you came from a crop of about 60,000 photos to make this more interesting in your eyes? I could have posted all 500 I had even set aside for this thread, and then just heard you say I am spamming. Sure, most been posted somewhere, but lots of people miss them, so there is nothing wrong with showing something youve seen 6 months ago so a new person can look at them for the first time. This is a recap, not a debut exibition. If I was going to do that, I would hold it all back. But whats the use in that approach? Did you hear me complain that you had too many wedding photos to browse through when you posted em? Am I devaluing my artistic integrity by showing MORE?

I did not mean to suggest you were spamming or anything like that. You made your own thread and didn't, say, append a pile of them to a bunch of threads they might have something to do with.

I mean, I get it, I didn't have to click in this thread and once I realized how many pictures there were I could have gone elsewhere (if it had been 500 I am sure I would have given up). But you are a good photographer and do a lot so that you're in a good position to take photos and have ended up with some amazing shots over the years so I kept going. But my eyes glazed over and most of the last half or so made no impact on me at all.

Maybe 80 is a good number for most people, who knows. Maybe someone should start a poll. I am just saying that, for me, this was too much.

Also, please. I posted a total of four wedding photos to this board and I linked to a page of thumbnails for those that wished to see more.

[Spooks]

Edit John? So you wanted me to post 40 photos instead of the 80 in here, which mind you came from a crop of about 60,000 photos to make this more interesting in your eyes? I could have posted all 500 I had even set aside for this thread, and then just heard you say I am spamming. Sure, most been posted somewhere, but lots of people miss them, so there is nothing wrong with showing something youve seen 6 months ago so a new person can look at them for the first time. This is a recap, not a debut exibition. If I was going to do that, I would hold it all back. But whats the use in that approach? Did you hear me complain that you had too many wedding photos to browse through when you posted em? Am I devaluing my artistic integrity by showing MORE?

Comparing concert photos and wedding photos

You're priceless!