Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 44

Thread: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

  1. #1
    Member mikebspeedracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    907

    Default mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    so because munford and sons are the flavor of the month they deserve to headline? cause they have earned that, right? they totally deserve to headline the number one festival in the world. and as much as people try to hate on some of the previous headliners like jack johnson, the killers, the kings of leon, kanye west, and the black keys; im pretty sure they all had atleast 4 albums out and had played the festival multiple times before. or in kanye west's case he had already headlined lollapalooza.
    eat sleep dab repeat

  2. #2
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Extreme longshot:

    -last week they announced a Nov 10th Hollywood Bowl show
    -they'd make more money doing arenas than what GV could offer them(figuring radius clause)
    -the "image" requirement for subs is different than headliners. Some hipster backlash is now present.
    -Is most of their audience one that doesn't want to buy a 3 day pass to a festival?

  3. #3
    old school microcuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    lansing_mi
    Posts
    2,710

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Is a radius clause even all that significant anymore? The festival sells out in 5 seconds regardless of if Pink Floyd is headlining, or Big Bird.
    2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2012b, 2013a, 2014a

  4. #4
    old school concertgoer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    5,503

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Come on now we all know that Big Bird would be a sub at best...

  5. #5
    old school SepaGroove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    3,217

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Mumford and Sons do have the number one album in the U.S. right now, but I just can't see them headlining yet.

  6. #6
    Coachella Junkie nathanfairchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    9,173

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    2 years ago they subbed. i could see them getting the bump to headliner.
    August 30 - Sleep
    August 31 - Sleep
    September 5 - Seth Troxler
    September 14 - Lily Allen
    September 16 - Earth
    September 20 - Skeletonwitch
    September 21 - Nails
    September 23 - Andy Stott
    October 2 - Beck
    October 3-5 - Austin City Limits
    October 10 - Bonobo
    October 20 - Mastodon
    October 23 - 26 - Housecore Horror Festival
    October 29 - The Melvins
    November 7-9 - Fun Fun Fun Fest
    November 15 - Primus
    November 18 - Slayer

  7. #7
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Quote Originally Posted by microcuts View Post
    Is a radius clause even all that significant anymore? The festival sells out in 5 seconds regardless of if Pink Floyd is headlining, or Big Bird.
    There's been 2013 official Hotel/GA packages from under $770/person available for months now, either weekend. GV is in the hotel business just as much as the concert business. M&S play a major full length LA show just a few weeks before GV announce the lineup and expect people to fork up for those pricey travel packages.

    Quote Originally Posted by SepaGroove View Post
    Mumford and Sons do have the number one album in the U.S. right now, but I just can't see them headlining yet.
    I could name 5+ Coachella headliners that wish they could move as many tickets as M&S will in the SoCal market in 2013. They can and will make more money doing their own tour and already have a conflicting LA area show.

  8. #8
    Milkshake suprefan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Burbank CA
    Posts
    43,940

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bumblebee View Post
    Extreme longshot:

    -last week they announced a Nov 10th Hollywood Bowl show
    -they'd make more money doing arenas than what GV could offer them(figuring radius clause)
    -the "image" requirement for subs is different than headliners. Some hipster backlash is now present.
    -Is most of their audience one that doesn't want to buy a 3 day pass to a festival?
    The audience is a good chunk of the ones that go to coachella. Look at everyone who saw them in 2010.
    Is there something wrong with playing The Hollywood Bowl in November?
    Image means nothing.
    They make LESS money doing arenas. They need to play outdoor amphitheaters to make the real money.




    All in all, its not happening anyway, so we should stop beating a dead horse for now....... Its not that it wouldn't ''work'' It's just that maybe GV doesnt feel they ''need'' them to play/headline. Lolla will have them for sure, Outside Lands, Sasquatch, and probably ACL too.

  9. #9
    Coachella Junkie stinkbutt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    9,527

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Don't they only have 2 albums?
    Quote Originally Posted by roboto View Post
    And stinkbutt leaving a motorhead set when you know he's dying just to talk shit ? Your a shitty person as well .please let mja give you an anal love disease .

  10. #10
    Member mikebspeedracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    907

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Quote Originally Posted by stinkbutt View Post
    Don't they only have 2 albums?
    yes, that is why I'm curious to how they could possibly fill a 2 1/2 hour set without playing their entire catalog twice
    eat sleep dab repeat

  11. #11
    Coachella Junkie stinkbutt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    9,527

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Since when do headliners play 2 and a half hours?
    Quote Originally Posted by roboto View Post
    And stinkbutt leaving a motorhead set when you know he's dying just to talk shit ? Your a shitty person as well .please let mja give you an anal love disease .

  12. #12
    Coachella Junkie Mugwog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6,666

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Since 2003

  13. #13
    Member mikebspeedracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    907

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    roger waters? lol i may of exaggerated a bit but come one they have 2 albums, theres no way they could fill a major festival set with 2 albums unless they really like to start jamming out up there and turn a 4 minute song into a 14 minute jam.
    eat sleep dab repeat

  14. #14

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    I dont think Black Keys played much more than 90 minutes last year.

    Mumford and Sons sold 600,000 records in their first week - I could see them headlining.
    They had a giant crowd last time. With 2 albums you could play 90 minute shows. They
    could throw in some cover songs too.

  15. #15
    Coachella Junkie greghead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    6,054

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Quote Originally Posted by stinkbutt View Post
    Don't they only have 2 albums?
    Yes, and they're both quite terrible.
    Quote Originally Posted by nathanfairchild View Post
    Has Pitchfork revealed it's top 200 covers by Arcade Fire yet?

  16. #16
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Quote Originally Posted by suprefan View Post
    Is there something wrong with playing The Hollywood Bowl in November?

    They make LESS money doing arenas. They need to play outdoor amphitheaters to make the real money.
    Name a past headliner that played a full length, full sized venue in the LA region between late October through to March of of the new year? This excludes the last minute Jay-z booking anomoly, short Xmas sets, short charity sets and warm up club shows. Leonard Cohen was allowed a major LA show the same week because of his aging demographic.

    The topic of radius clauses will pop it's head up in every lineup prediction thread. IMO, all acts with a major full length LA appearance between mid October and March will almost certainly not appear on the lineup come January.

    At it's most extreme, clauses would be mid October to late July(some Lolla contracts were upwards of 6 months before the event and 3 months after). M&S management had a choice between $2m for W1&W2 or however much they can make in the LA area during those 9 months with a gaziilion selling album and tour.

  17. #17
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mugwog View Post
    Since 2003
    Strokes and Dre only did an hour each.

  18. #18
    Coachella Junkie Mugwog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6,666

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    You were doing it wrong then.

  19. #19
    Coachella Junkie nathanfairchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    9,173

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Dr. Dre only has two albums. He headlined.
    August 30 - Sleep
    August 31 - Sleep
    September 5 - Seth Troxler
    September 14 - Lily Allen
    September 16 - Earth
    September 20 - Skeletonwitch
    September 21 - Nails
    September 23 - Andy Stott
    October 2 - Beck
    October 3-5 - Austin City Limits
    October 10 - Bonobo
    October 20 - Mastodon
    October 23 - 26 - Housecore Horror Festival
    October 29 - The Melvins
    November 7-9 - Fun Fun Fun Fest
    November 15 - Primus
    November 18 - Slayer

  20. #20
    Coachella Junkie heart cooks brain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    nomad's land
    Posts
    9,878

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    he was also only on stage for about 10 minutes.
    Quote Originally Posted by canexplain View Post
    If moles had subways, molestation wouldn't be one of the creepiest words there is ....
    Quote Originally Posted by canexplain View Post
    Eat don't chat ...When I figure out what windlowless is, I'll respond .
    i hear voices in my head and they keep caaaaallin' me

  21. #21
    SmellyBath
    Guest

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    I'd be incredibly bummed if they were a headliner and have my doubts of whether they have enough respect to garner that position. I mean sure some folk/power pop bands have headlined before but when Jack Johnson headlined the landscape of popular music and artist obtained by GV was different. How could you bill them higher than Hot Chip or Grizzly Bear when both of those bands respective albums this year have received loads more of critical acclaim? Honestly Tame Impala deserves it more than they do but they will be Outdoor sundown Saturday I'd guess. Regardless, boo to this possibility.

  22. #22
    Coachella Junkie Mugwog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6,666

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    KROQ wills it so

  23. #23
    Coachella Junkie Miroir Noir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Zip City
    Posts
    7,349

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    These fucking guys sold 600,000 albums their first week? Holy Christ I am out of touch with popular taste.
    Quote Originally Posted by canexplain View Post
    To you guys I say Wat?????????? Off to ?????? ....... cr****
    Quote Originally Posted by TomAz View Post
    It's hard to argue with that.

  24. #24

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Quote Originally Posted by SmellyBath View Post
    I'd be incredibly bummed if they were a headliner and have my doubts of whether they have enough respect to garner that position. I mean sure some folk/power pop bands have headlined before but when Jack Johnson headlined the landscape of popular music and artist obtained by GV was different. How could you bill them higher than Hot Chip or Grizzly Bear when both of those bands respective albums this year have received loads more of critical acclaim? Honestly Tame Impala deserves it more than they do but they will be Outdoor sundown Saturday I'd guess. Regardless, boo to this possibility.

    How could you bill them higher than Hot Chip or Grizzly Bear ? How about due to popularity and album sales.

    Tame Impala outdoor sundown Saturday spot - I doubt that.

  25. #25
    Peaceful Oasis TomAz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Zenith, Winnemac
    Posts
    40,846

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    Quote Originally Posted by Miroir Noir View Post
    These fucking guys sold 600,000 albums their first week? Holy Christ I am out of touch with popular taste.
    Welcome to my world.
    Quote Originally Posted by efrain44 View Post
    Anyone know who the guy in the Cardinals jersey is? I've seen him in pictures on the board and I thought I saw him this year.

  26. #26
    Member mikebspeedracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    907

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    i think it just comes down to kroq playing them every other song so a bunch of teenagers think its really popular and buy the album. they did the same thing with Linkin Park a few years back. Also im sure a bunch of teenage girls think they are hot like nsync, backstreet boys and every other boy band in the world thats been popular based on looks, so they buy it just because they are boy crazy. then you end up with a overinflated 600,000 records sold in the first week. when in reality most of the people that bought that album are probably still in high school and too young to even attend coachella, so to wrap this rant up, expect them to headline when their next album drops because by then those kids that are buying all of their albums up will be 18+ and will be able to goto coachella.

    ps i also think this is a way to get headliners for less since they payed the black keys half of what they payed Radiohead.
    Last edited by mikebspeedracer; 10-08-2012 at 02:57 PM.
    eat sleep dab repeat

  27. #27
    Peaceful Oasis TomAz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Zenith, Winnemac
    Posts
    40,846

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    oh come on they're not that bad.
    Quote Originally Posted by efrain44 View Post
    Anyone know who the guy in the Cardinals jersey is? I've seen him in pictures on the board and I thought I saw him this year.

  28. #28
    Coachella Junkie Mugwog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6,666

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    When they played in 2011, a girl I was dating really wanted to see them after we had spent the whole day wandering around seeing so much great music. We got to Mumford and Sons and found a bunch of friends by that huge space daisy thing, a few listening, others clearly bored. Maybe it was the paper we ate or maybe it was just how terrible M&S were, but it basically led to a "This is boring and there are no lasers, lets go back to the Sahara" Then Animal Collective came on and we clearly did not eat enough paper to appreciate that. So hopefully they put some more interesting things on the stage, but I doubt they will. #Coolstorybro #420

  29. #29

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    They'll headline if they play...they wont do a sub again.
    Cooler than a polar bears toenails.

  30. #30
    Coachella Junkie Ardentbiscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,696

    Default Re: mumford and sons possible headliners? really?

    I could imagine them being a cross over headliner with Stage Coach, but who knows?? Right? I'm probably completely off here.

Similar Threads

  1. Mumford & Sons Anyone?
    By Janeee in forum Line Up/Artists
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 12-03-2013, 12:49 PM
  2. Mumford and Sons
    By werner12123 in forum Line Up/Artists
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 06-26-2011, 04:06 PM
  3. mumford and sons vs one day as a lion?
    By elbrycen in forum Polls
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-20-2011, 04:43 PM
  4. Mumford & Sons Cancelled!!!
    By suprefan in forum Line Up/Artists
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 04-13-2011, 07:25 PM
  5. Mumford & Sons
    By aguadulce in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-20-2010, 02:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •