Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 105

Thread: BLUR for 2013

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    134

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    well blurs self titled album in 97 did pretty damn well and sold bucket loads in the US

    also its not a question of if theyre big enough in america, are they big enough with the coachella crowd
    i dont know anyone from LA that doesnt love blur

    if black keys can headline
    if at the drive in are big enough to sub headline
    if freakin bon iver can subheadline
    then yes BLUR can headline for sure

  2. #32

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Would love Blur but they won't headline.

    Comparing them to Black Keys is not accurate. Black Keys get played CONSTANTLY on just about every
    Los Angeles radio station for the past couple of years. And they are playing basketball arenas right now.
    Blur at the peak of their popularity played the palace in LA and that holds maybe 1000, maybe. They would
    be fantastic, but won't headline. Compare them to Oasis who had a whole bunch more hits in the US - they
    could headline a Friday night, and they sold out the Hollywood Bowl last time they played in LA.

    It's the same thing that people said Pulp and Pavement should have headlined - and how many people were
    at their shows.

  3. #33

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    i'd go to coachella just to see blur - the exact kind of band that should be playing the polo fields IMO.
    2005-2007-2008-2009-2010-2011-2012-2013-2014

  4. #34

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    woo-hoo!

  5. #35
    Milkshake suprefan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Burbank CA
    Posts
    43,938

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by frizbee9 View Post
    i'd go to coachella just to see blur - the exact kind of band that should be playing the polo fields IMO.
    Well you did end up 10 years late to the party. Shouldve gone in 2003.

  6. #36
    Member Dede' Arneaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    I'm on a tightrope baby, nine miles high.
    Posts
    777

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by suprefan View Post
    Well you did end up 10 years late to the party. Shouldve gone in 2003.
    Which was 9 years after the party really kicked off
    Dede' Arneaux
    Come a long long, come a long long way

  7. #37
    Member neverclever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    225

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by aguadulce View Post
    Would love Blur but they won't headline.

    Comparing them to Black Keys is not accurate. Black Keys get played CONSTANTLY on just about every
    Los Angeles radio station for the past couple of years. And they are playing basketball arenas right now.
    Blur at the peak of their popularity played the palace in LA and that holds maybe 1000, maybe.
    They sold out the Palladium at the height in 1997. But yeah definitely not big enough to headline and I'm a guy that flew to London in 2009 to see them.

    They will be at Coachella 2013 though.
    99 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13!

    Thanks for The Stone Roses and blur!!! Totally Enormous Extinct Dinosaurs, Electrelane, Dum Dum Girls, SISU, HUM, American Analog Set, Unrest, Lush, Inspiral Carpets, th' faith healers and Chavez for 2014 please!

  8. #38

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by concertgoer View Post
    Blur would not headline. They would be second or third on their day.
    you're an idiot. they would definitely headline.

  9. #39
    Coachella Junkie nathanfairchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    9,353

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    no they wouldn't. they are incredibly tiny here. coachella is probably the only festival that would book them to subheadline.

    November 7-9 - Fun Fun Fun Fest
    November 18 - Slayer
    November 19 - eyehategod
    January 31 - Mayhem/Watain

  10. #40

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanfairchild View Post
    no they wouldn't. they are incredibly tiny here. coachella is probably the only festival that would book them to subheadline.
    they're far bigger than PULP, and PULP were 3rd down in the lineup.

  11. #41
    old school stuporfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    4,573

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Well, well, well...
    Quote Originally Posted by garspaceman View Post
    well hello my fancy pants.

  12. #42
    Coachella Junkie rage patton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Vancouver BC
    Posts
    26,514

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Wasn't Blur like... 5th billed in 03? I know Graham Coxon wasn't in the band at that point, and having him back means higher billing.... but to jump from 5th to top billed? No way. Blur would be 2nd or 3 billed tops.
    Quote Originally Posted by bmack86 View Post
    And it's been long established that Chris hates fun.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hatinisbad View Post
    I took my niece this year and it was her first Coachella. It was so fun to see it through her eyes. She thought it felt like a magical scene from Shreck. The one where all the fairy tale creatures meet for the first time in Shreck's swamp.

  13. #43
    Judgy McMarco TeamCoachellaHellYeah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    24,309

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Blur on the Main Stage in 2003

    it went The Hives > The Blur > The Queens of the Stone Age > The Ben Harper > The Beastie Boys
    Quote Originally Posted by TomAz View Post
    Reviewers who note the size of the crowd are dumb fucks.
    COACHELLA's: 2001. 2002. 2003. 2004. 2005. 2006. 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2011. 2012. 2013. 2014. 2015.

  14. #44
    Coachella Junkie Boourns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    nowhere
    Posts
    26,809

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    THE Ben Harper. For some reason, that one stands out.
    10/16 Massive Attack @ Greek Theater (?), 10/18 Culture Collide, 10/26 Asobi Seksu & Slowdive @ Royale, 11/7 Warpaint @ Echoplex, 11/12 Blonde Redhead @ Fonda

  15. #45
    Judgy McMarco TeamCoachellaHellYeah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    24,309

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    I watched all of them except THE Ben Harper.
    Quote Originally Posted by TomAz View Post
    Reviewers who note the size of the crowd are dumb fucks.
    COACHELLA's: 2001. 2002. 2003. 2004. 2005. 2006. 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2011. 2012. 2013. 2014. 2015.

  16. #46
    old school concertgoer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    5,542

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    I would love to see Blur headline, but I think they would be second or third on their day
    Edit: and I said that months ago in this thread :/

  17. #47
    Judgy McMarco TeamCoachellaHellYeah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    24,309

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    You'll have to go to Espana for that.
    Quote Originally Posted by TomAz View Post
    Reviewers who note the size of the crowd are dumb fucks.
    COACHELLA's: 2001. 2002. 2003. 2004. 2005. 2006. 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2011. 2012. 2013. 2014. 2015.

  18. #48
    old school concertgoer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    5,542

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by TeamCoachellaHellYeah View Post
    You'll have to go to Espana for that.
    I would so go if it wasn't five weeks after Coachella.

  19. #49
    old school stuporfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    4,573

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    They're making a substantial jump from where they were last time around. That's my guess.
    Quote Originally Posted by garspaceman View Post
    well hello my fancy pants.

  20. #50
    old school concertgoer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    5,542

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanfairchild View Post
    no they wouldn't. they are incredibly tiny here. coachella is probably the only festival that would book them to subheadline.
    I wouldn't say that. I feel like they could play at least as big if not bigger venues then Pulp played in America last year.

  21. #51

  22. #52
    Coachella Junkie GuyInTucson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    8,088

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by menikmati View Post
    They're subbing.
    You know this for sure?
    10/8 - Little Dragon @ Marquee (Tempe, AZ)
    10/11 - Carolina Chocolate Drops @ Rialto Theater (Tucson, AZ)
    11/10 - The Black Keys @ US Airways Center (Phoenix, AZ)
    4/10/15 - 4/12/15 - Coachella

  23. #53
    old school concertgoer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    5,542

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    And now I am going to watch Parklive again

  24. #54
    Bambi menikmati's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    North Hollywood, CA
    Posts
    15,083

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by GuyInTucson View Post
    You know this for sure?
    Well no, but its the only thing that makes sense.

  25. #55
    Coachella Junkie nathanfairchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    9,353

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by concertgoer View Post
    I wouldn't say that. I feel like they could play at least as big if not bigger venues then Pulp played in America last year.
    i just meant when compared to europe. most people i know can't even name one song by blur and if they do they know them as that band with the "woo hoo" song.

    November 7-9 - Fun Fun Fun Fest
    November 18 - Slayer
    November 19 - eyehategod
    January 31 - Mayhem/Watain

  26. #56

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    I want BLUR as much, if not more, than DAFT PUNK! Oh golly! please coachella gods

  27. #57

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by stuporfly View Post
    They're making a substantial jump from where they were last time around. That's my guess.
    4th overall billed in 2003 to possibly being the 2nd overall name billed 10 years later is a HUUUUUGE jump, right?

  28. #58
    Member stochasticism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    453

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by wunderbrad55 View Post
    4th overall billed in 2003 to possibly being the 2nd overall name billed 10 years later is a HUUUUUGE jump, right?
    Since they have done nothing of consequence as a band since then, yes.

  29. #59
    old school stuporfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    4,573

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Five u's huge.
    Quote Originally Posted by garspaceman View Post
    well hello my fancy pants.

  30. #60
    old school concertgoer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    5,542

    Default Re: BLUR for 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanfairchild View Post
    i just meant when compared to europe. most people i know can't even name one song by blur and if they do they know them as that band with the "woo hoo" song.
    Fair enough. I think we can all agree that most Americans are dumb though.

Similar Threads

  1. Late Add: Blur
    By Whittick in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-19-2012, 03:13 PM
  2. Blur?
    By Commander Corn in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-01-2011, 05:39 PM
  3. Blur
    By Gribbz in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 306
    Last Post: 06-16-2010, 01:31 AM
  4. Blur?
    By Irish Blood English Heart in forum Line Up/Artists
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-01-2009, 11:25 PM
  5. Blur?
    By noavailibleids in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-24-2008, 10:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •