It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin: A Thread About Dating

[locachica73]

Gentleman caller doesn't sound like he would be much fun, I suggest "the man I am currently boning".

[guedita]

My slab of manmeat.

[ENluv12]

My slab of manmeat.

FTW!

[locachica73]

That kinda makes me hungry, but I am ok with that.

[Mugwog]

"Hey Jerry! Meet my current fuckhole/fuckstick"

[ENluv12]

Almost lunch time....

[locachica73]

Well, it's better than forgetting the guys name (which I have done).

[Kyliediscope]

You call them a boyfriend or girlfriend, or "significant other," if you want to be pretentious. This whole conversation is ridiculous.

Nothing bothers me more than a female referring to her partner as "my man."

My co-worker says partner, which made me think she was in a same sex relationship. I guess she thinks calling him her partner sounds more adult.

[ENluv12]

That is when I introduce the other person first...

"This is Tommy..." then the date says "Hi, Tommy, I am Brad"
It usually works out pretty well. Then again, that can backfire too.

[Drinkey McDrinkerstein]

[Gribbz]

I like using "my better half."

which made me think she was in a same sex relationship.

This is what I usually think as well.

[guedita]

Mom, Grandma, this is Gustavo, my slab of man meat.

[marooko]

My fuck.

[saranater]

"Guy I'm currently boning" and "slab of manmeat" are definitely on my short list... though I'm not sure how a guy would feel if we were legitimately monogamously dating and I introduced him that way. Guys have like... feelings.. and shit.

[locachica73]

If I ever find someone again I will now refer to him as the man I am legitimately monogamously boning.

[SoulDischarge]

Cum dump.

[saranater]

If I ever find someone again I will now refer to him as the man I am legitimately monogamously boning.

I like it. High five.

[OnlyNonStranger]

Bang maid.

[TomAz]

If I ever find someone again I will now refer to him as the man I am legitimately monogamously boning.

You could just refer to him by his name. "Frank". "Joey". "Dean". whatever. Why is it necessary to refer to him based on the terms of your relationship with him?

[saranater]

You could just refer to him by his name. "Frank". "Joey". "Dean". whatever. Why is it necessary to refer to him based on the terms of your relationship with him?

Because if you dont mention you have a boyfriend, slab of manmeat, or a dude you're legitimately monogamously boning, guys keep trying to stick things in you.

[locachica73]

Everyone has to have a title, if not then how would we know what roll they play in someone's life? The world would be in total chaos! This is Jim... Wait, is Jim her brother, uncle, dog, what is happening here?????

[Mugwog]

A 40 year old man who gets butthurt about you referring to him as your cock stump needs to go back to the cave of loneliness for a while

[Dogvolta]

Just by saying that, you sound a lot more serious.

Agreed. Also, the amount of maturity on this last page or two is astonishing.

EDIT: From a few posters, at least

[TomAz]

Everyone has to have a title, if not then how would we know what roll they play in someone's life? The world would be in total chaos! This is Jim... Wait, is Jim her brother, uncle, dog, what is happening here?????

Some things are not anybody's business.

[getbetter]

Some things are not anybody's business.

Extactly..also no one cares who your fucking most likely.

[amyzzz]

Maybe she wants to show off her man.

[guedita]

Labels are sometimes awful, sure, but we can at least all agree that we've all fantasized about that romantic moment when someone turns to you and says, "I want you to be my forever cum bucket."

[Mugwog]

I love showering my cum bucket with my love juice. Then we embrace in unity.

[TomAz]

Maybe she wants to show off her man.

Well that would certainly explain a lot.

[SoulDischarge]

Cock koozie.