Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 38

Thread: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

  1. #1

    Default THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    With confirmed shows on June in Manchester, they probably do a Festival before there world tour... could they do Coachella 2012?

    HEADLINER MATERIAL OR SUB HEADLINERS?

  2. #2
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,775

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Best case scenario:

    -Strong UK concert reviews
    -good feedback on new material
    -SR fever spreads over here

    They get Strokes slot in April 2013.

    They won't play Coachella in 6 months because they won't risk bad press from bad reviews and their management won't accept anything but headliners. GV admitted all headliner were booked by June 2011, 2 months before all 4 members rehearsed for the first time in August 2011.

  3. #3
    Chest Rockwell Gribbz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ATX
    Posts
    19,639

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Stone Roses would get the Pavement slot most likely. Definitely not headliners (at least not in this country).
    Quote Originally Posted by betao View Post
    There's an emoticon for jerking off on this forum?



    The National/Warpaint - 4/21 - Moody Theater
    Thee Silver MT. Zion Orchestra - 4/22 - The Mohawk
    Mogwai - 4/24 - Emo's
    Cloud Nothings/The Men - 4/26 - The Mohawk
    Austin Psych Fest - 5/2 - 5/4 - Carson Creek Ranch
    King Khan & the Shrines - 5/30 - The Mohawk
    Cut Copy - 6/21 - Stubbs
    Swans - 6/27 - The Mohawk
    Boris - 7/29 - The Mohawk

  4. #4
    Member Mr. Porter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    LA & Mililani
    Posts
    1,755

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Yeah they will most likely get The Verve treatment. But they will headline Glastonbury undoubtedly
    I'ma ball at the mall shuttin' down the sea wall

  5. #5
    Member Twattycakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Posts
    890

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    I'm not even sure they would get Strokes slot. Maybe Interpol slot.
    The Knife - Beck - The Cult - Motorhead - QOTSA - Outkast - The Replacements - Bryan Ferry - Pet Shop Boys - Temples - Crosses - Washed Out - The Preatures - Little Dragon - Mogwai - Broken Bells - Jon Spencer - Tiga - The Internet - Blood Orange - Naked and the Famous - The Knife - The Knife - The Knife - The Knife

  6. #6
    Member icedKeg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,730

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    PJ Harvey slot.
    Quote Originally Posted by Pee Wee Herman's Hermits View Post
    Melted my face off at Skrillex

  7. #7
    Member Twattycakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Posts
    890

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by icedKeg View Post
    PJ Harvey slot.
    This
    The Knife - Beck - The Cult - Motorhead - QOTSA - Outkast - The Replacements - Bryan Ferry - Pet Shop Boys - Temples - Crosses - Washed Out - The Preatures - Little Dragon - Mogwai - Broken Bells - Jon Spencer - Tiga - The Internet - Blood Orange - Naked and the Famous - The Knife - The Knife - The Knife - The Knife

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,158

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Porter View Post
    Yeah they will most likely get The Verve treatment. But they will headline Glastonbury undoubtedly
    Glastonbury's not happening in 2012.
    Quote Originally Posted by fancy restaurant View Post
    Although, I did attend more Slipknot concerts than any person ever really should. I remember once I told their lead singer "This is my 12th Slipknot show!" and he was just like, "Dude. Why?"
    Quote Originally Posted by cperkins9027 View Post
    Bring Aoki back next year and let him bring his friends. Open your minds and appreciate what he can do.

  9. #9
    I'dDoItAllAgain
    Guest

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Who?

  10. #10

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    I think that...

    I don't give a shit. I'll be at Sub Focus.


  11. #11
    Member Dede' Arneaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    I'm on a tightrope baby, nine miles high.
    Posts
    736

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Porter View Post
    Yeah they will most likely get The Verve treatment. But they will headline Glastonbury undoubtedly
    I'm not sure they will hold it together until 2013
    Dede' Arneaux
    Come a long long, come a long long way

  12. #12
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,775

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dede' Arneaux View Post
    I'm not sure they will hold it together until 2013
    Plus Glasto only pays a fractin of of VFest and others will be offering.

  13. #13
    Member Dede' Arneaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    I'm on a tightrope baby, nine miles high.
    Posts
    736

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bumblebee View Post
    Plus Glasto only pays a fractin of of VFest and others will be offering.
    They were booked to headline the Saturday of the 25th Glasto in 1995.
    John Squire fell off his mountain bike, broke his collar bone and they cancelled.
    If they dont implode at the end of the 2012 tour, I'd expect they'd headline Glasto 2013.
    Dede' Arneaux
    Come a long long, come a long long way

  14. #14
    Milkshake suprefan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Burbank CA
    Posts
    43,940

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    London Suede spot for 2012

  15. #15
    Member Mr. Porter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    LA & Mililani
    Posts
    1,755

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Ah thanks I totally forgot that Glasto will not happen next year.
    I'ma ball at the mall shuttin' down the sea wall

  16. #16
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,775

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by suprefan View Post
    London Suede spot for 2012
    because playing to 2,000 festival goers in indio with international media months before hometown gigs to 220,000 is appealing.

    Maybe April 2013 if there is a snowball effect of good press

  17. #17
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,775

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dede' Arneaux View Post
    They were booked to headline the Saturday of the 25th Glasto in 1995.
    John Squire fell off his mountain bike, broke his collar bone and they cancelled.
    If they dont implode at the end of the 2012 tour, I'd expect they'd headline Glasto 2013.
    Their Glasto 1996 booking fee is much different than their 2013 fee. Wouldn't UK fans already had a chance to see them throughout 2012? plus I don't anticipate huge setlist variation unless they get into new stuff or Second Coming tracks.

  18. #18
    Coachella Junkie GuyInTucson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,932

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Sub-headliner, no question.

    To anyone thinks they are worthy of a headliner spot: It's 2011, not 1989 and Coachella is in Indio, not Manchester. If they were atop the Coachella poster, there would be a lot of people in the 16-25 crowd that would collectively ask "Who the fuck are the Stone Roses?".... May sound crazy to many here but they are not big enough today in this part of the world to headline.
    Quote Originally Posted by HotHamWater View Post
    Nobody has ever given a single fuck about anything you've ever had to say.
    Quote Originally Posted by TomAz View Post
    Erik or Dani: Can we change Spooks' member title to "Stupid Pigfucker"? thanks.

  19. #19
    old school kroqken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Sherman Oaks, California.
    Posts
    5,536

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by GuyInTucson View Post
    Sub-headliner, no question.

    To anyone thinks they are worthy of a headliner spot: It's 2011, not 1989 and Coachella is in Indio, not Manchester. If they were atop the Coachella poster, there would be a lot of people in the 16-25 crowd that would collectively ask "Who the fuck are the Stone Roses?".... May sound crazy to many here but they are not big enough today in this part of the world to headline.
    I agree, but I am sad that they would not headline. Maybe a reunited Ride could headline, with Black Tambourine as a sub.

  20. #20
    old school concertgoer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    5,429

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    I don't even think they are big enough in the states to be a sub
    PJ Harvey slot at best
    Also I doubt that they will be playing in 2012, since it seems like their first gig back is the Manchester show in June

  21. #21
    Member blackchango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Mount Kilamanjaro
    Posts
    1,976

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Tickets to the Manchester shows have already sold out guaranteeing ticket holders in England their chance to see them there. Would backlash and demands for refunds from ticket holders back in England prevent them from possibly playing a one off show at Coachella next year for a "decent" paycheck?
    Quote Originally Posted by captncrzy View Post
    Is that written in some sort of underground rat language I'm not familiar with?

  22. #22
    Chest Rockwell Gribbz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ATX
    Posts
    19,639

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by concertgoer View Post
    I don't even think they are big enough in the states to be a sub
    PJ Harvey slot at best
    Also I doubt that they will be playing in 2012, since it seems like their first gig back is the Manchester show in June
    Yeah, I don't know why this is so hard for some people to accept. The Stone Roses are not big in the United States.

    I would love to see them at Coachella but I'm not holding my breath.
    Quote Originally Posted by betao View Post
    There's an emoticon for jerking off on this forum?



    The National/Warpaint - 4/21 - Moody Theater
    Thee Silver MT. Zion Orchestra - 4/22 - The Mohawk
    Mogwai - 4/24 - Emo's
    Cloud Nothings/The Men - 4/26 - The Mohawk
    Austin Psych Fest - 5/2 - 5/4 - Carson Creek Ranch
    King Khan & the Shrines - 5/30 - The Mohawk
    Cut Copy - 6/21 - Stubbs
    Swans - 6/27 - The Mohawk
    Boris - 7/29 - The Mohawk

  23. #23
    old school concertgoer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    5,429

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by blackchango View Post
    Tickets to the Manchester shows have already sold out guaranteeing ticket holders in England their chance to see them there. Would backlash and demands for refunds from ticket holders back in England prevent them from possibly playing a one off show at Coachella next year for a "decent" paycheck?
    Why would they though?
    If I were them I would much rather play my first comeback show to a sold out crowd of over 60,000 as opposed to a half empty Mojave tent or Outdoor theatre

  24. #24

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    There is NO way they would headline or even sub headline.
    Tent would be way better for them.
    If they played a show in LA right now they would be at the Wiltern
    or Palladium so 2000 to 3500.

  25. #25
    Member Premium Roast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    there is no escape
    Posts
    897

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    maybe being in the desert sun for two weeks, a chance to check out Southwest America without alot of timetables. John could use a tan.

    Doesn't seem likely, but like Chango indicated, they already sold out Manchester so who knows. "It's not where you're from, it's where you're at". Plus, Brits could fly out to LA for it.

    Think Goldenvoice is pretty much at the point of Coachella success where they can do anything they want with nearly any band they want. Roses may not accept, but an offer could be made. It's not etched in stone that Manchester must be the very first show. Sell em on it if necessary, get er done (or maybe it's already done).
    100% Caffeinated

  26. #26
    old school JebusLives's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,298

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    We're not getting them before their first UK gigs in June. Maybe 2013.
    Quote Originally Posted by juloxx View Post
    Your stupid

  27. #27
    Member pachucasunrise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Venice, CA
    Posts
    1,081

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by aguadulce View Post
    There is NO way they would headline or even sub headline.
    Tent would be way better for them.
    If they played a show in LA right now they would be at the Wiltern
    or Palladium so 2000 to 3500.
    You kidding? People would fly in from all over, they'd have to do a huge string at those venues. If we nab them for 2012, they'll sub Sunday. (Underneath Radiohead????????? I can always dream...)
    12/6: Japandroids/DIIV
    1/10: Mister Lies/Matthewdavid

  28. #28
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,775

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    Quote Originally Posted by GuyInTucson View Post
    Sub-headliner, no question.

    To anyone thinks they are worthy of a headliner spot: It's 2011, not 1989 and Coachella is in Indio, not Manchester. If they were atop the Coachella poster, there would be a lot of people in the 16-25 crowd that would collectively ask "Who the fuck are the Stone Roses?".... May sound crazy to many here but they are not big enough today in this part of the world to headline.
    I bet many 16-25 Bonnaroo fans would have said "who the fuck is Buffalo Springfield" earlier this year when those headliners got announced. Especially if Young/Still wasn't listed.

  29. #29
    Member sleepybrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    reno/sf
    Posts
    856

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    IF they are there. They get the spot JAMC got in 2007
    Iron Maiden, Boards of Canada and Underworld for 2013

  30. #30
    old school
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,775

    Default Re: THE STONE ROSES, HEADLINERS OR SUB?

    I could actually see a "FIRST EVER NORTH AMERICAN STONE ROSES SHOW BY THE CLASSIC LINEUP" byline/PR angle perhaps working in their favour.

Similar Threads

  1. Stone Roses!?
    By ecalcott in forum Line Up/Artists
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-18-2009, 05:11 AM
  2. Stone Roses to play???
    By shootmedown in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 09:39 AM
  3. Stone Roses are (probably) reuniting
    By HandBanana in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-19-2008, 11:48 AM
  4. the stone roses
    By matsuolost in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-09-2008, 01:09 PM
  5. THE STONE ROSES!!!
    By longbeach90803 in forum Rumors/Gossip/Wish List
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 05-03-2008, 12:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •