Make a Coachella Lineup In Retrospective - COMPETITION!

[menikmati]

I believe it's supposed to be 1986.

[blastyourears]

I like this one a lot.. would LOVE to attend.. ah

[menikmati]

The Offspring could never have headlined, though maybe pickings were slim.

[ewiggy]

i'm scared of menik looking at mine. be gentle!

[menikmati]

i'm scared of menik looking at mine. be gentle!

Well there is no way the Byrds would be billed that low, they would have headlined.

[C DUB YA]

that Keith Haring poster is 20 years in the future!

Not to mention, getting the rights to use those Haring images would make that the most expensive concert poster ever.

[pitipur]

Here we go...1997

[ewiggy]

Well there is no way the Byrds would be billed that low, they would have headlined.

ah, alright. my music knowledge of previous decades (especially the ones before i was born) leaves a lot to be desired. i knew i'd mix some stuff up, but hopefully most of it is solid.

[betao]

Savage Garden would've been billed higher in 1997 methinks.

[industrialwaffle]

Well there is no way the Byrds would be billed that low, they would have headlined.

This prompted me to change mine around a bit.

(But I just can't put them above The Beach Boys.)

[menikmati]

This prompted me to change mine around a bit.

(But I just can't put them above The Beach Boys.)

But surely the could be above the Zombies, no???

EDIT - ah see you moved em, nice call.

[ewiggy]

i just really, really like the Zombies. a lot more than i like the Byrds. i was trying to be more inventive/creative with the lineup than just what you might expect. i think Coachella is always a little surprising (in a good way) with the lineup, and that's part of what makes it stand out from the others.

[moomoo]

[Monklish]

So, wait, you can change them after the fact? Up until when?

[industrialwaffle]

So, wait, you can change them after the fact? Up until when?

Didn't think of this. She hasn't announced more winners yet, so I figured it wouldn't be an issue?

[dorkfish]

[Monklish]

Need a ruling here, menik. Also when's the deadline?

[moomoo]

I have no fucking clue where to start on making an actual lineup in retrospec

[menikmati]

Need a ruling here, menik. Also when's the deadline?

Until a winner is decided for a said year, I would say you can make changes to your entry/entries as many times as you want...afterall, you can even submit posters for more than one year...nothing is stopping you until a winner is decided for a particular year (like 1977).

[dorkfish]

For those that think it's funny to put sponsors on their poster, keep in mind that you're likely disqualifying yourself, since Goldenvoice would likely never put registered trademarks on their Coachella.com website.

[betao]

Brad, I really like that neon theme you have going. Compliments the year.

[betao]

and this made me laugh.

[menikmati]

Daft Punk headlining in 1997? Are you serious? C'mon now...no one knew who they even were back then.

[Monklish]

Son of a bitch... I pulled a ton of bands for 1965 and then realized there's a year range. Well fuck that.

[RexQuimpo]

Took off daft punk and replaced them with radiohead.

[betao]

Rabbit in the Mood sounds fun

[dorkfish]

Radiohead wouldn't have headlined in 1997, as well. OK Computer hadn't come out, yet, and The Bends charted at 88th in the U.S. They sold well on their 1997 tour, but they were only playing 1000-2000 capacity venues.

[Somewhat Damaged]

Some of these really suck, but then I get suspicious that they're just aliases fucking around. Or at least I hope so with all of these 1-3 post losers.

[menikmati]

Took off daft punk and replaced them with radiohead.

This is almost a total duplicate of my 1997 poster (talking the lineup part) that I made.....RIP OFF.

[dorkfish]

Some of these really suck, but then I get suspicious that they're just aliases fucking around. Or at least I hope so with all of these 1-3 post losers.

coachella twitter post the contest, so we're getting a lot of one-off hopefuls trying to win.