
Originally Posted by
Benis23
You're absolutely right about how treating mental illnesses can be very complicated and confusing. I think psychology is a pseudo-science in that there aren't clear, definitive answers to the problems - there's a lot gray area. These aren't chemistry or physics problems where there's one clear, right answer.
I happen to be taking a class right now where a lot of the reading deals with whether or not depression and other mental illnesses are diseases. One psychiatrist, Szasz, makes the case that mental illnesses are not diseases. He argued "only symptoms with demonstrable physical lesions qualify as evidence of disease; physical symptoms are objective and independent of sociocultural norms, but mental symptoms are subjective and dependent upon sociocultural norms; mental disorders result from problems of living; therefore, mental disorders are not diseases but conflicts resulting from differing social values."
Basically, he's saying whatever mental state you happen to be in is only a problem is society thinks that it is a problem. For instance, if you are constantly anxious and worrying about things, that is only a problem if you live in a reality where people around you are less anxious, they expect you to be less anxious, and you want to less anxious like the other people around you. In that way, mental problems are entirely subjective and dependent upon society. In my opinion, a lot of the blame for all these cases of mild to intermediate depression lies with society's expectations. We live in a society where people want and expect you to be smiling and happy all the time. Being sad or melancholy is seen as being bad or abnormal.
Personally, I don't like the idea that depression is a disease because it implies helplessness. If you are depressed, there are things you can do (even besides taking anti-depressants) that have been proven to reduce depression.